Monday, 22 October 2012

Soundtrack or Treat: A Halloween Mixtape

I used to regularly bother bars and parties playing willfully quirky selections of other peoples records mixed badly, something that ceased to be a unique selling point somewhere around the late nineties. I don't do this very often any more, except on the occasional aurally-masochistic request.

As a result, I have started making mixtapes again. This, along with my recent return to comics and loud and lousy bedroom guitar, is entirely symptomatic of my recent college-era geek regression. I plan to blog about the latter soon, but I haven't had much time to write recently. Instead, in celebration of the Halloween season, please accept the following mash up of horror soundtracks and other spooky seasonal treats, featuring guest appearances from John Carpenter, Burt Bacharach, Biz Markie and the long awaited meeting of Goblin with the Goblin King! 

Soundtrack or Treat! : Mat's Halloween Mixtape (Download on Soundcloud) 

Look away now to avoid the oncoming horrors of... 
  1. “Cropsy…” (The Burning)
  2. Saving the Day – Alessi (Ghostbusters)
  3. “The dead are coming back to life…” (Night of the Living Dead)
  4. The Gonk – Herbert Chappell (Dawn of the Dead)
  5. Haunted House – DJ Yoda feat. Biz Markie
  6. Suspiria – Goblin (Suspiria)
  7. The Blob – The Five Blobs (The Blob)
  8. “I knew this boy..” (Halloween)
  9. The Beyond – Fabio Frizzi (The Beyond)
  10. Putting out the fire – David Bowie (Cat People)
  11. Halloween theme – John Carpenter (Halloween)
  12. He’s Back (Man behind the Mask) – Alice Cooper (Friday the 13th Pt VI)
  13. Silver Shamrock – John Carpenter (Halloween III: Season of the Witch)
I'll be back soon, but in the meantime please visit my friends at the really good Garageland Magazine arts and culture blog where I've just guest posted on Bergman's Seventh Seal.

Happy Hallowe'en!

Sunday, 9 September 2012

The E17 Art Trail: Crafts, Cats, Cuts and Camera Porn


Every September the E17 Art Trail descends on Walthamstow in East London. This annual event connects the dots between the scattered creatives of the local area, inviting us to view the diverse work of over 3,500 professional and amateur artists. 


Whilst galleries, studios, shopfronts and sheds from Blackhorse Road to Wood Street have been seized for artistic subversion, perhaps the most fun can be had in visiting the many artists who are exhibiting from their homes.  There’s no curatorial agenda and so there is a delightful chaos in wandering from the little flat of an elderly amateur painter of floral watercolours to view the smart graphic work of the professional illustrator just across the street. In giving equal opportunities to creative endeavours from artists all backgrounds there are some genuine surprises to be found, regardless of whether you favour high concept artistic intervention or wholly unironic paintings of unicorns and fairies.

My highlights included professional illustrator Matt Richard’s audio-visual project, Musical Views, which featured crisp graphic portraits of local musicians alongside recordings with their sitters.


Richard’s digital drawings are rendered to capture an analog printed feel that neatly suited their subject.  His commercial work, also on display inside, was very strong in itself and so it was heartening to see that he had entered into the local spirit of the trail with his street installation.


I was also energised by the enthusiastic painterly adventures of David Bryan’s Inspiration Comes Tomorrow.  Bryan had been inspired to exhibit as part of the trail by a neighbour and had set himself the goal to putting together this exhibition of selected works in acrylic, oils, printing and photography.  He is clearly enjoying the challenge and was a buoyant host as he led us round his journey as an artist.  Like so many others on the trail, he wasn’t pitching himself as a fully formed professional but rather he was openly inviting us into his world through his journey into art.  He had a colourful energetic flair and I liked his woodcuts, prints and mixed media work that had somewhat of an Eastern feel, so I’ll forgive him for siding against me on the oil versus acrylic debate.  


Along the way, there is also enough room for the quirky and crafty.  The Made in Stow letterbox cinema is a cute conceptual installation that reimagines movie classics as if they were filmed in Walthamstow.  These are screened in a literal letterbox format (above).  

Meanwhile, the Back to Front project along Wingfield Road has sponsored residents to print large front window hoardings of any image they choose to represent themselves or their families – collaborating on an open air gallery that includes everything from Frank Sinatra to “the frog from our garden”.  


Idiosyncratic personal obsessions are a running theme, with last years’ Tears of Blood (above) being one of my all time favourites.  With very little explanation, a resident artist had exhibited a small collection of photoshopped images of giant cats crying tears of blood across picturesque landscapes.  When we arrived his house was busy with visitors and our host expressed genuine bemusement at his popularity.  “But…”, I tried to explain as if it was the most obvious thing in the world, “you’ve made images of giant cats…crying tears of blood…across picturesque landscapes!” Perhaps this says more about me than him.


The artworks here are not without teeth in other respects.  Notable inclusions this year included some worrying psychedelic portraits of local homeless people and a sculpture that invoked the notorious ‘milk-snatching’ of former Tory Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in a witty commentary on more recent Conservative Government cuts.  Both of these are exhibited at the little Vestry Museum which was also screening a series of short films; a diversion I was denied by my slight hearing issues and the fact it was one darkened room too many for one of the hottest days of the year.


More traditional craftsmanship can be found at the E17 Designers Market in the Asian Centre or at The Penny Fielding Gallery, where – among other things - the incredible and diverse leatherwork of saddler Mia Sabel is on display.


Just across the road from here you can find the unofficial mascot of the trail in Carl HarrisCatboy.  His Catboy series of drawings and prints are lively and joyfully energetic.  Originally, the boy with a cat for a shadow had only his titular feline companion to share in his adventures, but over the last year the daydreaming protagonist has adopted a bear and circus monkey into his fantasy menagerie.  Harris is something of an Art Trail success story with the Catboy’s charm proving as infectious as his own.


More pictures from a story yet to be written are on display in Amy McSimpson’s…er…Pictures From a Story Yet to be Written.  Her quirky illustrated characters dance playfully from the walls, the small collaged images offering a fractured glimpse into a captivating little world yet to be explored.  McSimpson is sharing an exhibition space with Sharon Drew, whose New Paintings are colourful, luscious and assured abstraction of the type I really like but people don’t seem to make so much anymore.  They were also notably generous with their time and their refreshments.

Finally, we spent a little time with Some Easons and a Bergman, which was truly a family affair, collecting the prints, paintings and crisp medium format photography of the eponymous extended family.  The medium format prints from a selection of vintage cameras are as good a reason as any to never touch the Hipstamatic again and they also had one of my favourite titles of the day – the (child friendly) Sir-Mix-A-Lot referencing, ‘I Like Big Hats and I Cannot Lie’.

It’s hard not to be drawn into the local narrative as you stumble from one little social gathering to the next, sharing recommendations and anecdotes – although with growing caution as you realise everyone seems to know each other.  This event showcases the strength of the community as much as the painters, poets, sculptors, knitters, makers and do-ers who line the route.  Many of the people we spoke to only got to know their neighbours through the event.  Whilst most of the work we saw was for sale, we never once felt like we were being given a sales pitch, instead people were welcoming and generous with their time and – in some cases – their wine.  We talked about community, art, the pain of losing the joy of swearing once having children, the various techniques of living room art installation, children’s book illustrations, the aesthetics of dragons and a great deal of technical camera porn.

Community art events of this nature are often exclusively niche – whether in the form of self-congratulatory urban hipster art markets or timid rural village fetes.  What the E17 Art Trail achieves by being so genuinely inclusive is that it becomes honestly engaging and relevant outside of the postcode. In placing creativity at the heart of the community, it celebrates the essential role that art can plays in our ability to communicate, to relate and to socialise. 

The E17 Art Trail continues until the 16th September.  You can read more about the event on the official website, where you can also download an app to plan your personal trail.  We only saw a fraction of the exhibited work but there is a very interesting blog project that spotlights some of the artists here.

Thursday, 30 August 2012

Frightfest The 13th: The Whole Bloody Affair


From humble beginnings at the Prince Charles cinema in 2000, Frightfest has established itself as the UK's premier horror and genre film festival.  Since my first casual visit in 2008, it has also established itself as an annual event I look forward to with unapologetic excitement.

Despite its later relocation to the grand surroundings of the Empire cinema in Leicester Square, apparently the largest screen in Europe, this celebration of the wild, the deviant and, occasionally, the frankly insane still manages to feel like an illicit and subversive treat.

Even if I can only attend for a day or two, it’s always a pleasure to soak up the atmosphere as I try to catch that one big festival hit that heralds the arrival of a wild new talent, be there for the surprise appearance of a genre legend or share in the rare moviegoing experience that blindsides an audience into stunned silence or laughter.  An incidental word of advice to those trying to do the same: take a look at the list of films I plan to see and select the exact opposite.  At film festivals, much like the rest of my real life, I seem forever predestined to be at the wrong place at the wrong time.  Back when I was at college, almost every gig-going road trip I chose to decline for some spurious reason ensured that the exciting new band I willfully missed would be just about to make the big time.  I hope that one day Radiohead recognise my no-show at the Leeds Town and Country in 1995 as a key element in their stratospheric success.  I think I saw Porcupine Tree instead and look what happened to them. Sorry guys. 

Anyway, for Frightfest 2012 I decided to challenge my pop-culture King-Midas-in-reverse curse and booked three and a half days straight.  With my long suffering and artfully misanthropic friend Kenton as festival co-pilot and unofficial Mat wrangler, we braved sleep deprivation, alcohol induced catastrophe, cosplay, thunder, lightning and the grueling horror of the night bus to tear off the biggest and messiest chunk of horror cinema we could manage.

Grabbers 
I was only able to make it in time for the last of the trio of festival openers on Thursday: the Irish monster movie Grabbers.  A friend was involved in the production and so I joined him beforehand with some of the assembled crew at The Harp – possibly my favourite central London alehouse.  This ensured I was able to ease myself into the appropriately booze softened mindset for the tale of a small Irish island community coming together to tackle a monstrous threat in the form of an invading giant space squid.  When it’s discovered that a high-blood alcohol level will kill the aliens, the drunken fight back begins with an all-night lock in.


Tremors is the obvious influence but there’s more than a measure of Gremlins too, the latter being delightfully homaged during a (literal) pub crawl by a batch of the newborn nasties.  Also in common with its inspirations, it’s a whole slimy bunch of fun, is very well paced, has some believable chemistry between the leads (Richard Coyle and Ruth Bradley) and features a wonderful supporting cast of eccentric alcoholics. 

Nightbreed: The Cabal Cut 
Friday morning delivered shameless fan service with a screening of the reassembled Cabal cut of Nightbreed followed by an interview with giallo legend Dario Argento.

Since its original release in 1990, Clive Barker’s Nightbreed has always had a reputation as a compromised beast.  Suffering from last minute reshoots and losing over an hour of footage, most commentators assumed the original cut to be lost forever.  However, following the recent discovery of two complete workprints on videotape, Mark Miller and Russell Cherrington worked tirelessly from Barker’s script to reintegrate this footage into the theatrical version and create this 153 minute ‘Cabal Cut’.


The core story of a man who believes he is a serial killer searching for the mythical city of Midian – a place where monsters can be accepted – is largely unchanged but characters are expanded, more time is taken getting to know the protagonists and further exploration of the mythology of the Nightbreed menagerie themselves lends the film a quite different, epic fairy tale atmosphere.  The Cabal Cut presents a much richer and more satisfying narrative, with Anne Bobby’s character in particular given a stronger and more central role.

The Cabal Cut was surprisingly enjoyable as a cohesive movie experience, despite at least half of the feature degrading to grainy VHS with a distinctly grimy “porn movie” quality.  I hadn’t revisited the movie in perhaps a decade but as the change in filmstock telegraphed excisions it was fascinating to reflect on the brutally awkward edits originally forced on the feature.

The Q&A featured the restoration directors along with a handful of the amiable cast.  They notably included Hugh Ross, who played Narcisse, an eminently quotable fan favourite.  His anecdotes strayed into Hellraiser territory with a touching reflection on how a small emotional breakdown whilst in the makeup chair was “a waste of sufferings”.  This is possibly a cautionary tale for all those actors who find themselves tangled up in Clive Barker’s phantasmagorical nightmare visions.

This Cut is very much a work in progress.  I spoke to some festivalgoers who had never seen the original version of Nightbreed and subsequently found the Cabal Cut a challenging experience to sit through.  This is a shame, but highlights the amount of restoration work still needed if this is to be anything but a curiosity.  If you want to know more, you can visit the Occupy Midian website to lend your support to the completion a proper release.

Total Film Icon: Dario Argento
If Dario Argento needs an introduction then you probably wouldn’t have stayed in the audience for this extended interview and I doubt you’d be reading this review in the first place. Argento is an Italian film director, producer and screenwriter. He is best known for his work in the horror film genre, particularly in the giallo subgenre and for his influence on modern horror movies.  He is not often known for his relaxed and revealing interviews.  Nevertheless, Total Film scribe Jamie Graham successfully steered his sometimes challenging interviewee towards some entertaining anecdotes and navigated carefully through the minefield of the last couple of underwhelming decades to focus on the Argento’s classic period.


There was some brief perfunctory talk concerning his most recent outing, Dracula 3D.  The most entertaining and potentially libelous anecdote involved Rutger Hauer, a young Russian girl and a bush.  As I don’t have the legal safety net of mistranslation, I’ll leave the rest to your imagination.  He did also make an interesting case for the potential of 3D, citing how impressed he was by a rare 3D screening of Hitchcock’s Dial M for Murder.  He spoke about his influences and the selection of his top 100 horror films for Italian television – six of which were his own.  When asked whether David Gordon Green could top the original Suspiria with his upcoming remake, Argento responded with a genuinely bemused “Go ahead and try.”  He also joined the audience in resounding laughter when Graham quoted Green as saying he wanted his remake of the famously psychedelic movie to be “more psychedelic”.

Predictably, the audience questions descended into a kind of love-in for the Maestro.  Whilst it was nice to see him appreciated, I felt some more actual questions might have been preferable – although Ken pointed out that I was watching with rapt bambi-eyes myself.  Regardless of whether this was the case, Argento’s appearance added a sense of gravity to the proceedings, much the same as Ali’s cameo during the Olympics but with a more hopeful glimmer that maybe – just maybe – Argento could yet make that elusive glorious comeback.

V/H/S
We skipped Hidden in the Woods and - following the rather negative reports of those that attended - demonstrated uncharacteristically good judgement in doing so.  I’d like to say this was a carefully calculated move but it was more a result of an increasingly desperate need for food, drink and at least a glimpse of daylight.  Following a giallo inspired pizza and wine break we returned for the most hipster screening of the weekend: the mumblecore found-footage anthology V/H/S.


The anthology framing device here is that a clutch of boorish low-rent criminal types are hired to break into a house to steal a specific videotape.  Inconveniently, they discover a dead body, sitting in front of a bank of television screens, alongside a vast stack of VHS cassettes.  As they search for their prize they watch some of the mysterious tapes and discover they contain five short found-footage films from five different up-and-coming directors.

Whilst not the worst movie we saw, the hype surrounding V/H/S meant it felt like the most disappointing.  It was overlong and much of the exposition was spent in the intolerable onscreen company of obnoxious frat boy shenanigans.  The hit-and-miss nature of the episodes soon gets tiresome, although there are inventive stylistic touches and Ti West’s Second Honeymoon at least allows us some character insight and a reasonable punchline.  For the most part, however, the stories don’t seem to go anywhere or have any particular point other than as a shaky-cam stylistic exercise.  Perhaps the worst culprit is the wrap-around tale itself, which – like its own (not quite) deceased antagonist - simply gives up and goes home before the final story.

Anthology segments need to be extremely tightly written to succeed but the majority didn’t seem to make a whole lot of sense except to be unsettling and weird.  Unsettling and weird can be fine for its own sake, if you have the time to build atmosphere or indulge in experiential filmmaking, but in short vignettes you really need to get to the point quickly with a neat payoff or a shock twist.   

The Strange Thing That Happened to Emily When She Was Young, the Joe Swanberg directed segment that plays out solely through the medium of Skype, is the strongest inclusion by far.  This is an engaging two-hander with a charismatic lead, a sense of mystery and some genuine scares.  It uses the stylistic touches of the found-footage medium to excellent and inventive effect, delivers a satisfying twist yet still keeps a little mystery for itself.  The problem here was that it came toward the end of the two-hour feature, too late to instil any enthusiasm for the two remaining tales and instead serving to highlight everything that didn’t quite work in the rest of the movie.  To conclude on positive note: the AV-mash up montage over the end credits was pretty cool but on the whole I think I preferred the awesome poster to the movie itself.

[REC]3: Génesis
The closer for Friday was Paco Plaza’s [REC]3, the next installment in the effective and inventive Spanish zombie series.  The first two [REC] movies were bloody and bleak with an interesting spin on zombie tropes, primarily concerning the inclusion of religious elements that present the zombie plague as a kind of viral demonic possession. [REC] and [REC]2 were also presented as found-footage and I naturally expected much the same from the three-quel. However, if V/H/S felt like a dour funeral for the found-footage format then [REC]3 is its riotous wake.


This episode is intended to occur at roughly the same time of the first two movies.  Here, Clara and Koldo are a young couple of newlyweds celebrating at a grand Barcelona mansion.  Via a neat but unfortunate twist for the wedding party, the zombie plague soon invades the reception.  Separated in the chaos, Clara and Koldo (Leticia Dolera and Diego Martín) fight alongside a plucky band of survivors in a desperate battle to reunite against the odds.  All manner of madness ensues, with standout scenes involving a chainsaw, a food blender, a hearing aid mishap and a delightfully odd nod to Don Quixote and Sancho Panza.

Unexpectedly funny and romantic in spirit, it has both splatter and genuine heart in generous measures.  Clara emerges as the most kick-ass vengeful bride since Kill Bill and the story wittily eviscerates the conventions and tone of the series while staying true to the mythology.  The opening scenes are delivered in the found footage style of a wedding video before that format is suddenly ditched in favour of a more conventional cinematic approach in a deft transition undertaken via a neat, somewhat meta scene involving the wedding cameraman.

While some of the audience seemed unhappy with the new direction of the franchise, it should be pointed out that what the made the [REC] series so refreshing was the irreverence with which it approached some of the conventional zombie horror tropes, so it shouldn’t really be a shock that Plaza has applied that same irreverence to the series itself.  I’m now very much looking forward to co-creator Jaume Balaguero’s [REC]4 .

Eurocrime! 
On Saturday morning, like the loose-cannon renegade I am, I was up early to catch to catch this documentary on 70’s Italian crime cinema…because that’s how I roll.


During the 1970s, the Italian Film Industry released hundreds of poliziotteschi movies.  These began as quick, cheap and grimy knock offs of popular American cop and crime thrillers, such as Dirty Harry and The French Connection, but their popularity would result in a trend to rival that of the preceding Spaghetti Westerns and Gialli.

Eurocrime tells the story of the poliziotteschi through anecdotes from genre luminaries including Franco Nero, Enzo Castellari, Henry Silva, Richard Harrison and John Saxon, all of whom speak openly and with tangible affection for the genre.  It is funny, fascinating and - in the case of the anarchic approach to stunts and guerrilla location work - genuinely thrilling as you realise just how many of the punches, car crashes and even bullets fired in these scenes were real.

Regardless of any initial interest in the genre, the gradual entanglement of politics and real life organised crime in these productions provides a fascinating parallel social history.  Tellingly, Ken had no experience of the poliziotteschi genre yet still enjoyed the documentary on the strength of the story it had to tell.  With some slight trimming and a little polish of the graphics, Eurocrime has the potential to be a breakout documentary hit with a wider audience.

Outpost: Black Sun 
Next up was Outpost: Black Sun – a zombie Nazi action movie.  Ken was responsible for wanting to see this one as it seemed to push all his military action, apocalyptic and…er…zombie Nazi buttons.  I’d made him sit through Argento so it was the least I could do and, besides, how could a zombie Nazi action movie not be fun?

Sadly, Outpost: Black Sun is exactly how.

It’s well shot with two strong leading performances (including Grabbers’ Richard Coyle) and makes great use of its limited budget, until you realise every scene seems to take place in the same little patch of forest, repeated over and over with different lighting effects.  Admittedly, once at the eponymous Outpost, we are momentarily excited by the appearance of some corridors, until we realise that we will now be running around these identical corridors for the remainder of the movie.   


During a later session of recriminations and apologies, Ken pointed out that this was a clear case of ‘Doctor Who from the Seventies syndrome’ – when the show became a tour of all the quarries in the UK.  It’s all taken very seriously too, with little fun, outrageousness or excitement to compensate.  In parts, it almost seems to think it’s Munich, but it’s not Munich because – ultimately - it’s about zombie Nazis trying to take over the world.  A movie about zombie Nazis could be many things but really it shouldn’t be this boring.

Next up was a break with Jim from the Midnight Video podcast for an impromptu listener meet up at The Chandos in Leicester Square.  Midnight Video is always an entertaining listen and co-presenters Jim and Phil have an easygoing chemistry and infectious enthusiasm that seems to generate unsolicited excitement for even the most terrible relics from the movie graveyard.  They also make some great discoveries too.  The Chandos is one of a handful of Sam Smiths’ pubs in the centre of London, a brewery chain that eschews advertising, gimmicks and flashy promotions to concentrate on serving a fine selection of their own beers and spirits at an affordable price.

With that Eurocrime inspired product placement section of my review safely over, we headed back for the evening screenings, beginning with Under The Bed. 

Under The Bed 
Neal Hausman (Jonny Weston) has returned home to reconnect with his estranged father, stepmother and brother, Paulie.  The reunion soon turns sour, however, when it seems that the mysterious monster under the bed that had tormented him years before – and may have been responsible for the death of his mother in a housefire - has turned its attention to his younger sibling.

Under The Bed seemed to divide people, but I enjoyed this slice of good old fashioned Spielbergian family drama.  The first two thirds of broken family tensions and fraternal bonding are effective and rather touching before the final reel spins off into more brutal and hysterical fantasy horror territory.  Some people felt a little alienated by the sudden change in tone but I found the conclusion was all the more effective for coming from the distant leftfield.  It also ensured that by the time the characters were established as actually being in mortal and decapitative danger, you really did care about them. It also helped that the young brothers at the heart of the story are convincing and sympathetic in a way that child actors often seem to find so hard to achieve.

Some of the characters are underused and there is a problem with languid pacing in the middle of the movie, but it’s quite atmospheric and, in the uncertainty over which direction you feel the story is going to take, channels the odd mood of its closest cinematic antecedent – Poltergeist – rather well.

At this point, Ken was evidently missing his fix of apocalyptic misery so he went to see Remnants at the second screen.  Apparently it was very good – in a depressing yet moving kind of way - which made him happy.  I stayed in the main screen to watch Tulpa.

Tulpa 
Alongside the glamorous cast and crew, Alan Jones announced the screening of Tulpa with a cry of “giallo is back!” There was much anticipation that Federico Zampaglione’s movie would be a contemporary rebirth or revival of a much-maligned genre that had long descended into parody.


The murder mystery plot will seem familiar to those with even a loose working knowledge of the giallo and its conventions.  A beautiful successful businesswoman, whose nocturnal thrills take her to the mysterious underground sex club Tulpa, finds both her bedroom and boardroom colleagues being elaborately murdered in a series of stylish set pieces.  With few suspects left standing, she begins to wonder if she herself is unwittingly responsible for the crimes or whether there may even be some supernatural force involved.

Tulpa lovingly repackages and amplifies the tropes of the giallo, turning the violence and eroticism up to undici. The sexual content in particular is given more attention than in the classic era of the giallo.  Unfortunately, some of the more frustrating aspects of the genre have also been inherited, most notably in the terrible English language dubbing and the baffling translation of a script I would suspect was already leaning toward the wacky.

At first, this seems entirely self aware - with a stylishly executed bedroom-bondage murder followed immediately by a scene of boardroom exposition that introduces our heroine.  This first scene of generic corporate dialogue is delivered in the awkward and stilted English language dub we all know and love but subsequently switches to Italian subtitles when the Chairman complains of the necessity of having to deliver such meetings in English. This is a delightful moment at which it seemed the film had directly addressed this key failing in the serious giallo and then promptly dispensed with it in a smart and witty fashion.  Just one scene later, however, it sadly proves not to be the case as the unintentional comedy of the English dub returns for the majority of the feature and dominates and drowns out any subtlety of parody the film has of its own.  Even worse, the dub was in turn drowned out by the roaring laughter of the Frightfest crowd and it was hard not to cringe in embarrassment for the assembled cast and crew.

The problem is that beneath the unintentional laughs of the dubbing, the film clearly has a wit of its own, but that subtlety – as evidenced in the opening scene described above - was lost as one outrageously wooden line followed another.

Some of the worst treatment is reserved for poor Michela Cescon, who plays Lisa’s friend Joanna.  Her performance was overdubbed with a peculiar British accent that was reminiscent of a woman with a brain injury in an awful Richard Curtis movie.

In this respect, there’s very little difference in it’s deficiencies to the classic giallo of thirty years ago.  If an audience can willfully look beyond this in Argento I’m not sure why it seemed to entertain so much here.  Perhaps it was because there was an expectation this would be a neo-giallo of sorts, a reinvention or rebirth of the giallo, when if fact it could better have been appreciated if approached as a lost film or unreconstructed homage.

The distraction of all this is a shame as there is much more to enjoy here. It is sumptuously shot, there are deviously inventive death scenes, a terrific baroque score, a charismatic lead performance from Claudia Gerini and a snakes eye perspective of a transexual chase through the sex club. At its conclusion, Tupla is also blessed with the wackiest giallo deus-ex-machina since Alice the chimpanzee saved the day at the conclusion of Phenomena.  Holy hermaphrodite scanners, Batman!

At times it is wonderfully inspired, at other times it is woefully misguided, but either way it was sublime entertainment to watch in a packed and boisterous cinema.  There are two movies here in a way.  I would love to see an Italian language version to fully appreciate Zampaglione’s style and true intent but on the other hand the Frightfest dub will always remain an awfully quotable guilty pleasure. 

Maniac 
Finally, the day closed with the hobbit-bothering Alexandra Aja produced remake of William Lustig's sleazy cult 1980 slasher of the same name.  Elija Wood leads as Frank, the owner of a mannequin shop who is dealing with his repressed sexuality and troubling maternal issues by brutally stalking, killing and scalping women in a barren New York netherworld.

Maniac is a startling technical achievement and I found it deeply disturbing.  Aside from two key scenes, it is shot entirely from the killer’s point-of-view.  The audience is both captive and complicit – forced to share the experience of Frank’s empty and dislocated life with every dreamlike and meandering incident of his daily routine threatening to explode in another gruesome act of violence with soul crushing inevitability.  With a bombastic synthesiser soundtrack reminiscent of Drive and scattered with increasingly surreal vignettes as Frank’s weak grasp on his reality collapses, Maniac is arthouse meets grindhouse.


This subtext of art meeting sleaze is made explicit when Frank meets Anna, a photographer whose subject is mannequins.  The young artist, fascinated by Frank's craft and seemingly seduced by his outsider status, tries to draw him into her uptown world.  His awkward inexplicable courtship – and futile attempts to curb his murderous impulses – forms the final painful act of the movie.  The first person perspective really pays off during the last act as we find Frank has become both our protagonist and antagonist.  We know Frank is a monster, but he is a human too, not a space squid or zombie or demonic entity hiding under the bed.  We find ourselves not sympathising or empathising or even truly understanding Frank but we are desperate to find some hope, some meaning, some purpose to what we have seen.  Of course, it shouldn’t be a spoiler to reveal that there is none to be found here.  Some felt Tulpa was the best worst movie of the weekend but Maniac is in some ways the extreme of this.  It is not an enjoyable experience and it’s not a film I could ever say I like: it is nihilistic, bleak, gruelling and unquestionably nasty – not to mention deeply and troublingly misogynistic – but I have to admit it is astonishingly powerful.  I didn’t even feel comfortable making any scalp-referencing ‘wigging out’ or ‘hell toupee’ twitter puns and that is saying something.

By Sunday, I was starting to feel cimema fatigue but determined to finish my cinema marathon on a more upbeat note.

Berberian Sound Studio 
To say Peter Strickland’s Berberian Sound Studio polarised opinion would be an understatement.  This arthouse love letter to 70’s Italian exploitation cinema stars the oddly compelling Toby Jones as Gilderoy, a meek sound engineer from suburban Dorking.


Gilderoy relocates to Rome to work on a horror movie, The Equestrian Complex.  We see the perfectly realised opening credits of this movie, but the rest is left for our imagination to draw from the aural soundscapes as we follow Gilderoy working alongside the Italian crew to overdub and provide the sound effects of their mysterious supernatural thriller.

At first, it’s seemingly played for droll ‘fish out of water’ laughs as the homely Gilderoy struggles to engage with the passionate and intense working methods of the Italians.  But as the production slows to a crawl, tensions rise and Gilderoy finds himself seemingly trapped in the claustrophobic confines of the titular studio, life begins to imitate art. Supernatural and giallo scenes begin to play out in the ‘real world’, incidents repeat themselves and Gilderoy is trapped in this cyclical limbo for so long he begins to talk in Italian.

With a fine absorbing soundtrack by retro-futurist electronic outfit Broadcast, rich period production and a detailed, lingering and near pornographic approach to the technical delivery of movie audio mixing, I enjoyed every moment of the running time right up to the sudden white-out ending.  At this point, I suddenly realised I had no idea what had just happened.

Was it a Kafka-esque meditation on the frustration of claiming expenses or was there something more diabolical behind Gilderoy’s metatextual unravelling? If we choose to interpret this as a self referential take on the filmmaking process, it could be viewed as a more sober arthouse take on Tom DiCillo’s Living in Oblivion, only with less Steve Buscemi and more violence to cabbages.

I think the problem was that it was presented alongside much more conventional horror movies and referenced the genre with so many knowing and beautifully reconstructed moments of homage that we are tricked into expecting a final reveal to tie everything together. But it is not a conventional horror movie and, on reflection, I think any definitive ending would have negated the wonderful dream logic of the rest of the movie.  The most appropriate way for it to conclude was for it to remain a puzzle and invite its viewers to return again and again to indulge in its audio visual delights.

Sinister 
Sinister was a slick supernatural serial killer production starring Ethan Hawke as Ellison, a crime writer who has moved his family into a "murder house" so that he can investigate a case of mysterious serial murders that may save his fading career.  As these serial murders have all involved identical family units to his own, not to mention the box of snuff movies he discovers in the attic, you will probably guess this wasn’t a good idea.


It’s a straightforward ghost train ride and it does exactly what it sets out to do, although it was also surprisingly mean spirited, which was somewhat refreshing for a mainstream American production and came as a perversely pleasant surprise.  Along the way Sinister delivers some genuine jolting shocks, had some admirably subtle sound design and some welcome, but sparingly used, comic relief.

There are more than a few confusing developments and plot holes but Hawke’s performance makes Sinister work.  He delivers a serious and layered performance in the face of increasingly ridiculous supernatural proceedings.  He also overcomes an unlikable character – and weird goatee – to create a lead you come to sympathise with.

It was plainly written by genre fans and there are a couple of playful and knowing touches that set it apart from the crowd – notably the fact that, at the first indisputable sign of a supernatural presence in their house, the family immediately pack up and leave unhindered that night like any sane family would.  It’s a nice touch and would have worked in any other haunted house movie of it’s ilk – just not this one, obviously. 

In Memoriam 
Although the festival rolled on into the Monday, Sinister was my final movie for this year. This meant that I still managed to miss a number of well reported screenings, including both Jaume Balagueró's Sleep Tight  and Jen and Sylvia Soska's American Mary.  I've also failed to mention some of the peripheral highlights.  Among these was a screening of Lee Hardcastle's claymation version of The Raid (with cats) and Simon Pegg presenting Special Effects wizard Greg Nicotero with the first Frightfest Variety Lifetime Award. Of the sneak preview footage screened, the most interesting seemed to be Neil Jordan's upcoming revisionist feminist vampire epic, Byzantium, and Ben Wheatley's black comedy, Sighseers. Overall it was a very enjoyable few days, as much for the company as for the movies.  In the programme, Frightfest speaks of its audience as family and it’s something I’ve come to really appreciate over the years.  It’s funny to find such a sociable group of people being brought together by their love of often anti-social movies, but even at their most cantankerous, sleep deprived, outraged or hungover, it’s the sense of shared enthusiasm by everyone involved that ensures I’ll keep coming back.

Some soulless reanimated zombies...
and the Frightfest 2012 poster
I love horror and genre film mostly because I love film. It’s a view that is shared broadly by filmmakers as much as viewers.  Many of the highest regarded writers and directors working in cinema today – be it artistically or financially - began their career in low budget horror or genre pictures.

Genre hero turned mainstream success Sam Raimi expands on this: “[Horror film audiences] are very savvy to film technique. The horror audience is the most original audience out there. They don’t want sequels, they don’t want what most of the audience wants. Most of the time audiences want to see versions of what they’ve seen before. Horror audiences are like, ‘no. Show me something I’ve never seen before! I want to be freaked out!’ My hat’s off to them. They’re a really original audience. Even more than the art film crowd they’re the ones who break new ground and accept new techniques from filmmakers on the cutting edge. Not the indie guys, but those guys. The low-budget horror fans.”

Even just within the dozen or so movies I’ve reviewed above, the diversity and invention of the genre is clearly evident.  Events like Frightfest recognise the contribution of the fans and even allow the audience to share a little ownership over these movies.  It creates a sense of community that charms guests and attendees alike.

In such company, it’s all too easy to suddenly and accidentally find yourself overestimating the importance of movies – but ultimately it has to be a healthy form of escapism, being able to spend at least some time not worrying about the very bad things happening in the real world and enjoy watching the very bad imaginary things happening onscreen for a while instead.


Faces of Frightfest: Paul McAvoy, Greg Day, Alan Jones and Ian Rattray have run the festival since its inception.  Irrepressibly energetic, amiable and enthusiastic, they still introduce every feature, moderate interviews and chair Q&A sessions as the pubic face of Frightfest (pic: film4.com)

Tuesday, 26 June 2012

Loving the Alien: Prometheus and a Review of the Alien Quintet from Memory


Warning: the following article is extremely SPOILER heavy

I usually eschew movie reviews on my blog as more able, more literate, more funnier and…er…more grammatically correct cinema scribes are legion on the internets.  Nevertheless, my own conflicted opinion of Prometheus, Ridley Scotts return to the universe of his seminal space horror, prompted me to finally make my long delayed entry into this overcrowded arena.

In Prometheus, android crewmember David (Michael Fassbender) reflects that "big things have small beginnings."  It could be that he refers to the tiny glob of black goo he holds on his fingertips - a cosmic slop that just might hold the key to understanding of the birth of all human life - but it may equally hold true for the Alien saga itself.  This twisting and evolving series has been a constant movie presence in the first three decades of my life. As a kid I loved all things alien related and even dressed as Kane from Alien – complete with polystyrene chestburster – for the fancy dress party at my aunties wedding.  A rough calculation suggests I must have seen Alien when I was just 11 or 12.  That's probably close to child endangerment...

Alien on Board: Kane (John Hurt) in Alien (1979)
But enough of my small beginnings for the time being.  Alien (1979) was released when I was not even two years old and it is in this taut, bleak and claustrophobic sci-fi shocker we find the small beginnings of Prometheus.  Here, the crew of the deep-space haulage ship Nostromo are stirred from hibernation to answer what they believe is an extraterrestrial distress signal from a mysterious source.  They discover a strange biomechanical spacecraft whose sole occupant appears to be a long dead and fossilised alien corpse, it’s chest burst ominously open from the inside.  The famous sequence that follows loses little of it’s horror over repeat viewing.  Crewmember Kane (John Hurt) unwisely inspects the yonic lipped opening of some grotesque egg just a little too closely.  The egg disgorges a clawed crablike organism that immediately attaches itself to his face, incapacitating him and – as we later discover – impregnating him with the embryo of a vicious killer xenomorph.  Showing some hint of grim slapstick timing even in its earliest years, this alien-on-board decides to messily explode from Kanes stomach around the dinner table.  With the assistance of the only special effect in the movie that has notably dated rather badly, the newborn puppet-on-a-stick scurries off into The Nostromo, leaving the bloodsoaked crew in shock.

What follows - as the Alien matures quickly and begins to eliminate the crew one by one - is a brutally efficient stalk and slash thriller set aboard the cramped confines of the spaceship, with a creature that can’t be reasoned with or understood.  The mystery of the movie is maintained as the gradually diminishing crew are too busy fighting for their lives to take the time to reflect on specifics of their situation.  Similarly, the viewer is kept as much in the dark as the alien itself, the tension rising as our glimpses of the creature and its gory handiwork are largely offscreen or obscured by shadow.

Unlike Star Wars, the Freudian nightmares
of Alien were never likely to inspire a family
friendly line of merchandising.
This is perhaps what frustrated me a little when I first saw Alien.  I’m not sure how young I was, but I do remember wondering what all the fuss was about. I was plainly too young to appreciate the dark psychosexual undertones and it didn’t quite deliver the white-knuckle terror promised by the fusion of the mysterious and doomy VHS sleeve coupled with my hyperactive and adolescently perverse imagination.  I think I was at an age that equated tension and fear with the illicit exploitative thrills of the trashy horror and action cinema I was forbidden from watching.  Perhaps that was precisely because I was forbidden from watching such movies. In my early teen mind, Science Fiction in particular demanded spectacle – and if it couldn’t deliver spectacle, then outrageous sleaze would suffice.  John Carpenter’s The Thing had delivered spectacularly and I had expected much the same from Alien.  Shamefully, I recall being more excited in the potential suggested by the gaudy videotape art of sleazy Alien knock-offs like Xtro or Inseminoid.  Maybe I had been desensitised: but I doubt this was the case, as just a glance of the grimy battered cover of a pre-prohibition videotape of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre had given me sleepless nights for weeks.

The classic Alien from Alien
A couple of years later, as I began to appreciate there was more to cinema than simple B-movie shock value, I realised that Alien was a far better movie than I was able to recognise at such an early age.  The fact that Alien has established itself comfortably as a genre landmark of both science fiction and horror, yet is also such a unique beast in it’s own right, is testament to its its enduring power.  Incidentally, neither Xtro nor Inseminoid maintained their imagined positions as unseen classics far beyond the crawl of their opening credits – although, for the record, Xtro is better and does have some demented charm.

Alien is enjoyable as a harsh and dark burst of spook-house horror but the many rich ideas and concepts buried gestating inside the very simple primary tale are what truly give the wider universe its imaginative fertility and longevity.  The Alien itself, designed by Swiss artist H.R. Giger, is a perfect killing machine right from the grotesque moment of its birth.  Its terrible efficiency makes the unresolved mystery of its origins more compelling.  Giger’s biomechanical set designs, that mirror the carapace of the xenomorph, suggest the sense of a much bigger horror taking place on a grand scale.  The look and feel of his nightmare surrealist landscapes is genuinely unsettling, all the moreso when introduced into the worn-out blue-collar future world of The Nostromo’s crew of weary space truckers.  

Ellen Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) in Alien
The solid cast of adult character actors, including Tom Skerritt, Yaphet Kotto, Ian Holm, Harry Dean Stanton, Veronica Cartwright and Sigourney Weaver, meant it was hard to know who - if anyone - would survive.  Of course, it was Weaver, as Ellen Ripley, who would eventually emerge triumphant as lone survivor.  According to the structure of the slasher movie, she would be considered the Final Girl, but Ripley was not a typical teenage final girl, she was a woman, and whilst her largely male colleagues were violated, penetrated or impregnated, Ripley eschews the traditional hollow victory of the Final Girl, neither sexually degraded nor stripped of her femininity in order to survive.  This is quite an achievement, considering she spent the climax of Alien stripped to her underwear and menaced by what is essentially a psychotic dripping phallus. Weaver would go on to be the star of the next three movies and as firmly associated with the series as the titular xenomorph itself. Ellen Ripley didn't even emerge as a principle character until a third of the way through the movie, yet by the finale she had taken on an iconic status.

Ripley gets tooled up in Aliens (1986)
It’s no surprise that the franchise would come to be typified by the work of auteur directors, keen to take part in a slimy tenticular game of exquisite corpse with such rich material.  The sequel, James Cameron’s Aliens (1986), immediately exceeded all expectations when we watched it for my fourteenth birthday party.  Whilst it was faithful to the concept and character of Alien, it had evolved into a full-blooded action movie.  In the grim and gritty 70’s, heroism in American cinema was served with a side order of self-loathing, pessimism and bleak resignation.  By the 80’s, the post-Watergate, post-Vietnam hangover was over and a new spirit of jingoistic Reganomic bombast was its replacement.  In the movies, might was right and so might was mighty, outrageously so.  I may plead irony in retrospect, but I loved the epic ass-kicking cinema served by cartoon musclemen such as Schwarzenegger, Stallone, Lundgren and Van Damme.  Once again, the politics may have escaped me, but the explosive and unashamed heroics of Commando, Rambo and their ilk were a guaranteed good time.  I suppose it was natural that, when my youthful rebellion finally kicked into gear, I would become such a born-again die-hard liberal and Guardian reading fickle apologist.  So it goes.

Anyway, it was the eighties now – and this time it’s WAR!  Ripley has been rescued by her employers, the distinctly shifty Weyland-Yutani corporation, only to find she has been drifting in deep space for 57 years.  Her own daughter has since grown old and passed away.  She’s naturally kind of traumatised.  Nevertheless, a chance at redemption comes in the unlikely form of Paul Reiser as a creepy representative of the company who informs Ripley that the planet on which she first encountered the xenomorph has since been colonised.  It now seems that all contact has been lost with the colony and so a team of hardened space marines intend to return to LV426 in order to find out what is going on and, if necessary, kick some slimy ass.  Ripley, as the only non-feline survivor of the earlier alien encounter, travels with them.  Initially she is there in an advisory capacity but as things go badly wrong, she once again steps up to take charge and save the day in an ass-kicking capacity.


Have you ever noticed the similarities between the James Cameron screenplays
for Rambo: First Blood Part II and Aliens?


You might think that with all this talk of ass kicking there was a danger that the franchise had lost its dark and doomladen atmosphere, but whilst there is all manner of military-tech-pornography and initial macho bravado from the marines, the DNA of Alien was too grim and twisted to be fully subverted in such a way.  Instead, Cameron wisely uses these tropes to emphasise our vulnerability and weakness against the ferocity of the aliens.  That’s aliens, plural – as there are hundreds of them now, thanks to the heroic egg-laying efforts of the Alien Queen.  She is Cameron’s major new addition to the life cycle of the aliens and is an incredible and frightening presence thanks to practical effects work from the very talented Stan Winston.

In characteristic fashion, James Cameron adds some 
cannon to the Alien canon in the form of the Colonial
Marines weapon of choice: the M41A Pulse Rifle

Cameron also chooses to build on the suspicious motives of Weyland-Yutani, picking up where Alien left off and further building up the scheming corporate puppetmasters as the ‘human’ villains of the piece, caring little for their colonists or employees and with an agenda to use the ‘alien situation’ to their own advantage.

Finally, in a way, Cameron also re-engages the with the gender politics of Ripley.  No longer willing to be a victim or a bystander, she is the only person in the team to truly understand their predicament and effectively takes charge of the mission.  Along the way, she rescues a young colonist girl who acts as a surrogate daughter.  It is this fiercely protective maternal motivation that results in Ripley’s final showdown with the Alien Queen – two mothers fighting for their families.  You could argue that female empowerment might be more eloquently demonstrated than through a climactic ass-kicking beatdown, but it’s powerful imagery and seems appropriate in a series where reproduction itself is an act of violence and gender roles are tangled and subverted.  Also, it was also the Eighties.

This is probably the closest to a happy ending that the series has for us – with the Queen defeated and Ripley and her adopted ersatz family returning home.  If you think Ripley has suffered enough and deserves to settle down to a quiet and peaceful life at home, you had best look away now, because there’s another storm coming.

Alien 3 (1992): Not particularly a date movie
If we choose to view Alien and Aliens as reflections of the neuroses of the respective decades from which they were spawned, then David Fincher’s Alien 3 (1992) could be seen as the bratty Generation X stepchild of the then-trilogy.  It is grungy, intense and very angry at its parents.  An unwelcome stowaway, in the form of an alien facehugger, causes the crash landing of Ripley’s escape pod on an isolated prison planet, immediately killing her potential love interest and adopted daughter.  To make already dire matters worse, the unwelcome stowaway has also stowed away an even more unwelcome stowaway in the form of an embryonic Alien Queen inside Ripley.

In the opening ten minutes of the bleakest entry to the series, Ripley has lost everything she has fought so hard for.  Nevertheless, Ripley isn’t willing to go the full Cobain without a fight.  Realising there is another xenomorph loose on the planet, Ripley attempts to warn the small community of inmates of the danger they are in but her pleas fall on deaf ears.  In fact, they seem more concerned about the sudden appearance of a woman in their male-only community.  This concern is made more acute by the perverse adherence to pseudo-religious beliefs from some inmates and a deep and threatening misogyny from others.  Before long, however, an Alien begins munching it’s way through our brutal band of brothers and it’s yet again clear that Ripley represents their only hope.  This time, there is no technology or futuristic weaponry to assist them.  The prisoners lead a largely monastic life and so their struggle against the lone xenomorph is a bloody dirty battle of wits.

In a final twist, a tooled up Weyland-Yutani delegation arrives to save the day – or at least to save the Alien Queen just ready to hatch from Ripley.  Finally realising that she can’t risk the Alien falling into their untrustworthy hands, Ripley throws herself into a molten pool, sacrificing herself to save all of humanity – and flip the bird to her ex-employers at the same time.  It's a much-maligned movie, that both begins and ends with a defiant "F*ck You!" to the audience and, as a result, it is the most alienating of the alienating of the Alien movies.  It was also the first of the series that I was old enough to legitimately see at the cinema and so, fortunately, I was also responsive to the nihilism of the teen zeitgeist. Well...I had a checked shirt, at least.

Nevertheless, in retrospect it seems a downbeat but more-or-less fitting conclusion to the series.  It’s a return to the sombre and dark territory of Alien, but incorporating some of the additional mythology of Aliens.  It’s a reflective piece, with the quiet and intense atmosphere giving Ripley’s character a chance to breathe, pause and reflect.  The sequence leading to an unexpected love interest with prison doctor Charles Dance is touchingly played – giving Ripley a chance to show some of the vulnerability that the chaos and machismo of the previous movies gave her little time for.  Aside from it's attitude, there are other more serious structural problems with Alien 3.  There are too many faceless convict characters, although a strong frontline includes the ever-reliable Pete Postlethwaite, Charles S Dutton and Brian Glover. Considering the Alien on the loose here was birthed from a cow - thus adopting some of the host species characteristics - it is disappointing that the opportunity was missed to have Glover terrorised by a hyrbid Kestralien.  I would have enjoyed that.

The narrative gets a little confused towards the end and parts of the movie feel truncated and awkward, which seems to be the result of the notably troubled production.  Fincher had a famously bad time in the Directors Chair as he was seemingly trusted as a stylistic voice by the studio, but not with the story – his fury at their meddling in his attempt to forge a personal vision should be a lesson learned for all producers who want an auteur for their big budget movie; you may get art, you may get a crowdpleasing popcorn hit, but you can’t rely on both.  Fincher often refers to Alien 3 only as that movie, which is unfair as his distinctive voice is quite evident in the final cut.  The entirely unnecessary next entry, however, is where things really start to go wrong.

Alien Resurrection (1997): The cloned Ripley 8 meets
her newborn: a humalien hybrid that rejects the Alien
Queen and looks to Ripley as it's true genetic mother 
figure. It's all rather creepy.
In Jean-Pierre Jeunet’s Alien Resurrection (1997), military scientists have made a clone of Ripley from a trace of her Alien-corrupted DNA in the hope of recreating the Alien Queen inside her for some presumably nefarious military reason. Having successfully reproduced both Ripley and the latent xenomorph, chaos inevitably ensures when a group of space mercenaries, including Jeunet regulars Dominique Pinon and Ron Perlman, interfere and release the aliens to take over the Space station before it reaches Earth.  Winona Ryder is an android terrorist and Ripley also ends up as the surrogate mother of a newborn humalien hybrid creature...or something.  The very fact that I can't untangle a clear and coherent synopsis from memory demonstrates just how muddled and confused this movie is.

On paper, it must have seemed a great twisted idea. Jeunet had established a reputation as director of wildly imaginative surrealist masterpieces such as Delicatessen and The City of Lost Children – however, without his usual collaborators and in inheriting a project that had been awkwardly gestating for some time previously, little of Jeunet’s dark magic seemed to make it to the screen. There is some intriguing Grand Guignol here, particularly in the scene where Ripley 8 meets what is left of her preceding seven cloned sisters, yet overall it fails to reproduce the mystery or tension of Alien and the action sequences are too perfunctory and flat to invoke the excitement of Aliens

Prometheus (2012): Installing a massive
 sculpture of your massive face in your
massive spaceship is probably a tad
narcissistic.
And so we return right back the beginning again with Prometheus (2012).  Set thirty years prior to the events of Alien, archaeologist couple Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green) discover a star map shared by several unconnected ancient cultures. Believing this may be a clue to the origins of humanity, the Weyland-Yutani Corporation sponsor their passage on an exploratory mission alongside the crew of the titular spacecraft Prometheus.

Upon arrival, the discovery of a strange exterrestrial complex yields further hieroglyphic and holographic evidence of an absent and mysterious alien race either long dead or dormant.  Shaw christens these alien beings Engineers, believing they support her creationist belief that all life on Earth was a result of these cosmic beings.

Inevitably, it quickly becomes evident that there are hidden agendas – both alien and human.  The Engineers turn out to be far from benign and all too late Shaw realizes that what may have at first appeared to be an invitation could instead have been a warning.  This is a nice touch as it mirrors the misinterpretation of the warning signal as a distress call that first drew the crew of the Nostromo to their own alien doom.

In exploring the role of the Engineers as its central narrative, Prometheus picks up on perhaps on one of the most intriguing mysteries of Alien: that of the dessicated “space jockey” discovered by the Nostromo but quickly forgotten, not only by the embattled crew but in the subsequent movies of the series.

Prometheus (2012): An Engineer sans 
Doh-Nutters inspired spacesuit
The Engineers themselves are an incredible CGI creation.  In the prologue, we witness what appears to be one of these beings sacrificing itself to create life on a distant planet that may or may not be our own.  It turns out that the elephantine remains we saw in Alien were actually some kind of biomechanical spacesuit.  Beneath the suit, these large and imposing beings appear much closer to human beings, yet bigger, ripe with swollen musculature, more primal and powerful, almost an athletic parody of Classical Olympian Gods.  With eloquent use of the uncanny valley, they are familiar to us and almost beautiful, yet repellent and utterly alien at the same time.

While the sole remaining resident of the complex discovered by the Prometheus team slumbers in stasis, the visitors work to understand the meaning of what they have found and are troubled by a whole menagerie of small creatures, seemingly birthed from the mysterious black goo of life. The same gunk also manages to mutate one of the crew into something quite odd and messed up.  The snakelike scurrying beasties have properties like acid blood that mirror those of the xenomorph but there doesn’t feel like any uniformity to the transformational properties of this ooze.  This jars awkwardly with the gloriously reconstructed Giger designed backdrop and these additions feel overcomplicated and somewhat confused.

The Engineer from Prometheus formerly
known as The Space Jockey from Alien 

This is the problem of the film as a whole: Prometheus works best with the BIG things but suffers when it comes to the small stuff.  There is epic scope and scale, with some truly stunning world building, but the detail in the more intimate moments - from the vicious alien flora or fauna to the subtleties of minor characterisation - feels lazy and ill-defined.

The relatively calm reaction of the crew to their unimaginably important discovery is an example of how this weakness damages the movie. The haste of the narrative to disclose its epic creationist mythology leaves us little time to share the journey or absorb the implications alongside the characters. Perhaps our future descendents are just a little more ambivalent about everything – but even the swiftness that our intrepid away team, in an alien and potentially hostile environment, immediately abandon the safety of their breathing apparatus the very moment it's discovered the air could be breathable detracts from the big ideas of the movie. All but the principle cast feel very loosely sketched, to the point that toward the end of the movie I had a great deal of trouble telling the secondary crew apart. A special mention should go to one of the least convincing members of the cinematic scientific community since Keanu Reeves discovered the secret to successfully using sonoluminescense to create stable bubble fusion in Chain Reaction: the Angry Geologist played Sean Harris.  At least his character motivation is clear: he "f*cking loves rocks!"

Definately NOT loving the alien:
Noomi Rapace in Prometheus
Where characters do manage to become three dimensional, it is largely due to the efforts of the individual actors to overcome the underwritten script.  Noomi Rapace is clearly a Ripley analog, which is a shame as she gamefully tackles one degradation after another but never feels like she is given the chance to make the role her own.  Charlize Theron does her best to add a hint of vulnerability to a rather flat role and Idris Elba similarly brings a likeable charisma to the jaded captain of the doomed spacecraft.  It is telling that the standout performance is from Michael Fassbender as David, the distant and morally ambiguous android member of the crew.  Admittedly, he is not human and so does not have a clunkily scripted attempt at personality to deal with – but what he achieves in a nuanced and subtle physical performance practically dominates the feature.  Early on in the story, in an attempt to approximate a human identity, he studies Peter O’Tooles performance in Lawrence of Arabia for inspiration.  He subsequently channels O’Toole for the remainder of the movie, making us question what is beneath the façade of his every action and intention.  Scott cited the David Lean's muscular epic as the inspiration for Prometheus and the success of Fassbender here makes me wonder whether he should have encouraged writer Damon Lindelof to follow suit.

He's got the whole world in his hands:
Michael Fassbender in Prometheus
The undercooked script is all the more infuriating as the broader story and mood of Prometheus does effectively, for me at least, feel very much like it’s set in the same universe as the original trilogy.  This may be placed in stark contrast when compared with Alien Resurrection, which does not.  Of course, all the movies contain an element of sequential narrative and shared design cues – not least in the xenomorph itself – but the tone, feel and attitude of the wider universe established in Alien truly only feels wrong in part four.  The crew of the Nostromo from Alien, Hicks from Aliens or even Brian Glover from Alien 3 could make an appearance in Prometheus and it would feel quite natural. In contrast, the only way that some of the eccentric pantomime characters of Alien Resurrection could make an explicable cameo in any one of the other films would be if they’d stepped in briefly from some bizzaro mirror world.

Some people also had a problem with the gleaming new design of the technology used by the intrepid travellers of Prometheus as they feel it’s inconsistent with the dirty and run down ‘used future’ of the preceding films.  It’s not something that bothers me. Prometheus, after all, is a prequel, set in 2089.  The doomed crew of the Nostromo would not encounter their xenomorph until three decades later in 2122 – not to mention that by the end of the series a full 291 years have passed.  That’s long enough for any kit and associated caboodle to be rendered irreparably FUBAR.  The only contradiction in technology I might question is whether Lance Henriksen is really an upgrade of Michael Fassbender?

The Xenomorph we all know and love
Even though Prometheus takes a very different approach to Alien, it clearly shares inspiration and antecedents: most notably in it’s return to writer HP Lovecraft for the source of its cosmic horror.  Alien scribe Dan O’Bannon openly acknowledged Lovecraft’s influence on the original movie. In Alien, Ian Holm's character Ash famously states that the alien is "unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of morality...a perfect organism...whose structural perfection is matched only by its hostility."  This is a truly Lovecraftian notion: the alien isn’t evil in the conceivable sense of human morality.  Rather it is a force of dark nature, beyond our understanding.  Prometheus takes us further into territory that the late O’Bannon, a longtime Lovecraft enthusiast, had long hoped to realise, sharing much of it’s big idea with Lovercraft’s classic tale At The Mountains of Madness.  This story recounts the adventures of a scientific expedition who discover the remnants of a strange and ancient alien race that may have been responsible for creating humanity as well as a race of monsters who appear to have the terrifying power to destroy us all.  Sound familiar?

With this rich heritage mind, it’s almost a shame that Prometheus still feels the need to make so many more additional and slightly clunky nods to the canon.  This is most troublesome in the closing 20 minutes in which there seems to be a rush to introduce a version of xenomorph we all know and love.  It turns out that the xenomorph is a bioweapon, created by the Engineers to wipe out the more disappointing of their planetary creations - but we only have the word of Captain Idris Elba to account for this and he doesn't have time to explain the workings behind this sudden epiphany before he crashes the Prometheus into the departing Engineers vessel.  Never mind, the crew seemed to trust him implicitly: no-one questioned where he got Stephen Stills squeezebox from either.  

This late-stage attempt to definitively assimilate the Alien legacy felt too sudden and incongruous. It just wasn’t needed and there was already enough connecting tissue between the prequel and the series that it would have been more convincing to leave some of these questions unanswered and mysterious.

Of course, Prometheus has some new mysteries of its own: What does the black goo actually do?  Why cast a 44-year-old Guy Pierce as the elderly stowaway Charles Weyland only to spend his entire short appearance in not-particularly-convincing prosthetics?  Why go to all the trouble of setting up the story to appear to take place on the planet from Alien, but then throw a rug from under us by stating this is actually a different planet? 

HR Giger's iconic "horseshoe" spacecraft has travelled further than
any other vessel through the series despite only spending a brief
ten minutes in the air at the climax of Prometheus

Perhaps these loose threads are calculated to set up a second movie.  Scott has already begun to talk up the possibilities of a sequel but Prometheus leaves questions I find simply confusing rather than compelling.  With apologies to my friend Ted: I’m not really all that interested in a cosmic re-imagining of Cast Away with Rapace as Tom Hanks and Fassbender as Wilson.

Perhaps what disappointed me most about Prometheus is a more mature reflection of the same teenage reservations I’d had following the playground hype of Alien.  Prometheus arrived with a sense of genuine mystery: I’d learned by now not to build my expectations around what had gone before – but instead I was secretly hoping for an epic game-changer, a mind twisting spin on the secrets of the saga.  Instead, it seemed that Ridley had exactly the same uncertainties as to what form this new chapter of the canon would take as I did.  Its an interesting movie and I enjoyed it, but I can’t help but feel it’s not going to inspire the same obsession, the same teenage birthday screening excitement and the same long term cultural impact on our current age restricted audience as its antecedents did on my generation...

All the same, who am I to judge?  I've met younger people who have some affection for Jar Jar Binks...but that's another story, of another retroactive prequel, in another galaxy, far away...